yak(credo-strict-tuned-config-both-apps-x02d): credo strict, tuned config (both apps)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
|
||||
defmodule Firehose.CredoConfigTest do
|
||||
@moduledoc """
|
||||
Pins the *policy* in `app/.credo.exs`, not just the file's presence.
|
||||
|
||||
The gate is `mix credo --strict` (the `credo` target in `app/Makefile`, a
|
||||
prerequisite of `check`), so the config decides what every future commit has
|
||||
to satisfy. Plain `ExUnit.Case`: this reads and evaluates a file, it does not
|
||||
touch the database or boot the app's supervision tree.
|
||||
|
||||
The assertions are deliberately coarse - "this check sits in that list",
|
||||
"the disable says why", "the custom check is still loaded" - so they survive
|
||||
credo's own boilerplate churn but not a policy change.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
use ExUnit.Case, async: true
|
||||
|
||||
@config_path ".credo.exs"
|
||||
@complexity_check "Credo.Check.Refactor.CyclomaticComplexity"
|
||||
@custom_check "Firehose.Checks.NoConnShadowing"
|
||||
@custom_check_load_path "lib_dev/firehose/checks/"
|
||||
|
||||
test "cyclomatic complexity is disabled in favour of CRAP" do
|
||||
checks = default_config()[:checks]
|
||||
|
||||
assert @complexity_check in check_modules(checks[:disabled])
|
||||
refute @complexity_check in check_modules(checks[:enabled])
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
test "the disable carries a rationale comment" do
|
||||
rationale = rationale_above(@complexity_check)
|
||||
|
||||
refute rationale == [], "no comment block above the #{@complexity_check} entry"
|
||||
assert Enum.join(rationale, "\n") =~ ~r/crap/i
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
# Regression guard: `mix credo.gen.config` would silently drop both of these,
|
||||
# and the custom check would stop running without one word of warning.
|
||||
test "the custom check and its load path survive" do
|
||||
config = default_config()
|
||||
|
||||
assert @custom_check in check_modules(config[:checks][:enabled])
|
||||
assert @custom_check_load_path in config[:requires]
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
defp default_config do
|
||||
{config, _bindings} = Code.eval_file(@config_path)
|
||||
Enum.find(config.configs, &(&1.name == "default"))
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
defp check_modules(checks) do
|
||||
Enum.map(checks, fn
|
||||
{module, _opts} -> module_name(module)
|
||||
module -> module_name(module)
|
||||
end)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
# `Atom.to_string/1` keeps the "Elixir." prefix that `inspect/1` drops; the
|
||||
# assertions read better (and diff better) without it.
|
||||
defp module_name(module) do
|
||||
module |> Atom.to_string() |> String.replace_prefix("Elixir.", "")
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
# The contiguous `#` block immediately above the check's own line. The entry
|
||||
# line is the one that is not itself a comment: a comment mentioning the
|
||||
# check by name must not be mistaken for the entry.
|
||||
defp rationale_above(check_name) do
|
||||
lines = @config_path |> File.read!() |> String.split("\n")
|
||||
|
||||
index =
|
||||
Enum.find_index(lines, fn line ->
|
||||
String.contains?(line, check_name) and not comment?(line)
|
||||
end)
|
||||
|
||||
lines
|
||||
|> Enum.take(index)
|
||||
|> Enum.reverse()
|
||||
|> Enum.take_while(&comment?/1)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
defp comment?(line), do: line |> String.trim() |> String.starts_with?("#")
|
||||
end
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user